The Disproportionate Gender Differences of COVID 19

March 11, 2021 By Deborah

Women are disproportionately effected by the complications and disease outcome of COVID-19 compared to men.

Gender-specific conditions have the potential to worsen the heart and lung damage caused by this virus. COVID-19 is a vascular disease. Women, compared to men, have smaller blood vessels, which can become dysfunctional and affect the body’s ability to deliver oxygen and nutrients to the heart. This microvascular dysfunction leads to ischemia which results in plaque erosion, clot formation and a potential cardiovascular event, such as a heart attack or stroke.

Other risk factors include polycystic ovarian disease, early onset puberty and the fact that women have higher incidences of autoimmune disease–putting them at risk for cytokine storms (hyper-responses of the immune system). Even though males have higher plasma levels of immune cytokines (immune cells called to the site of infection), women with higher levels of these cytokines were associated with worse disease progression and outcome than men.

The risks to women who have had problem pregnancies (preeclampsia, gestational diabetes) and women going through menopause are also notable. Estrogen helps prevent cardiovascular disease, and as their estrogen levels decline, menopausal women experience a higher likelihood of developing heart disease. Depression increases the risk of heart attack in women by 50% although researchers are unsure why. Severe shock can also take its toll on women. Broken heart syndrome, or takotsubo cardiomyopathy can cause fatal heart damage to mostly menopausal and postmenopausal women who have undergone a sudden stress such as losing a spouse, a car accident or being a victim of a violent crime.

Effective therapy and prevention is needed which starts with educating women in knowing their risks.

Gender differences for increased heart disease were already in place before COVID-19, but it is important to understand the increased risk factors for women that present themselves due to the nature of this virus.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2700-3

Marijuana and Pregnancy- Not Recommended

February 16, 2021 By Deborah

As legalization of marijuana spreads, 7% of pregnant women in the U.S. are using this unregulated drug to help reduce morning sickness. But is it safe?

In some states that legalize marijuana, dispensaries can be as common as coffee shops. Like smoking cigarettes or alcohol consumption, anyone over the age of 21 can easily walk into a store and buy a variety of compounds recreationally for their own use. But there are risks to be aware of, especially for pregnant women. Are the people behind the counter knowledgable enough to give sound advice to pregnant women seeking medical advice?

A study at the University of Colorado looked into the type of information being provided by staff members of marijuana dispensaries. Investigators posed as 8-week pregnant patients and called 465 dispensaries which resulted in useful information from 400 locations. Investigators asked employees if they had products that were “safe for morning sickness.” Other questions were about any known risks to the mother or baby with taking these products and whether they should check with their own health care provider. Results were: 69% of staff members recommended marijuana products for morning sickness, and 36% said that it was safe to use in pregnancy. Only 32% recommended that the patient check with her physician, but after prompting, 81% eventually recommended it.

This may not be happening in every state, but this study gives you a glimpse of how many pregnant women are likely not asking their provider for advice on the safety of using marijuana for morning sickness. But instead are seeking medical advice from marijuana sales people who not only have a conflict of interest and lack of medical knowledge but also a lack of cautionary approach on the topic.

Currently marijuana products contain from 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) up to 15% and, even some concentrations up to more than 50% THC. THC acts on CB1 receptors that have psychotropic effects. Cannabidiol (CBD) acts through its effects on serotonin and not CB1 receptors for the most part. Cannabis, the marijuana plant, contains up to 100 cannabinoids with the two that we most know about described above. Dependence and addiction affects about 9% of users. This is compared to 15% of the population addicted to alcohol. This can lead to the risk of addiction to the newborn, let alone other potential consequences of cannabinoid exposure in utero.

There have been studies showing that children exposed in utero to cannabis performed more poorly in visual problem solving, motor coordination, had attention deficits and childhood sleep problems for up to a decade compared to unexposed children. Yes, thats right. According to a University of Colorado, Boulder study and lead author John Hewitt, director of CU’s Institute for Behavioral Genetics, marijuana use can impact children’s sleep long term!!

Other potential effects include increased risk of stillbirth, low birth weight (if using cannabis more than once per week) and preterm labor (those using cannabis and smoking cigarettes). A few older studies have not shown any differences in adverse outcomes with pregnant users vs nonusers. With marijuana products not being regulated and not knowing the specific ratios of THC/CBD, it can be very confusing to know what may harm mother and/or baby.

One thing for sure, marijuana use has not been proven to be safe in pregnancy. It is recommended not to use cannabis products during pregnancy-whether for recreational or medical purposes. Consult your practitioner about other safe and effective natural options for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.

The medical use of cannabis is legal with physician prescription in 35 states. The recreational use is legal in 14 states.

Even though the use of cannabis is federally illegal, some of its derivative compounds have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration fo prescription use. For non-prescription use, cannabidiol derived from industrial hemp is legal at the federal level, but legality and enforcement varies by state. This map can identify what your state laws are regarding the use of marijuana State map of marijuana.

References: https://disa.com/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state

Dicson, B, et al. Recommendations from cannabis dispensaries about first-trimester cannabis use. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131: 1031-1038.

Hudson, T. Marijuana in Pregnancy-Please Don’t. Townsend Letter. Women’s Health Update. Feb/March 2019. p. 30-33.

Ultraviolet Light Can Kill the COVID-19 Virus

January 30, 2021 By Deborah

The start of 2021 is all about getting this COVID pandemic under control. Distributing vaccines as quickly as possible and continue to social distance, avoid large gatherings, wearing masks and washing our hands will be an essential part of developing herd immunity and getting our lives back to what was once normal.

Another part of reducing the presence of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) is to find ways to destroy the virus in the environment before there is an opportunity for it to infect us. Much research has looked at the benefits behind good filtration systems and higher humidity to reduce the virulence of the virus. We are now re-visiting the benefits of ultraviolet light and its ability to kill viruses, bacteria and mold. Scientists have known about the disinfectant capabilities of ultraviolet light for decades. More than a century after Niels Finsen in 1903 won the Nobel prize for discovering that ultraviolet (UV) light could kill germs, UV light started being used in hospital rooms and other public places.

There are 3 types of ultraviolet light based on wavelength. The longest wavelengths are UV-A (315-400nm) and UV-B (280-315nm) which are found in ordinary sunlight. These rays can cause sunburn if you are outside too long without protection. They have limited germ-killing ability. But UV-C light (200-280nm) is part of the ultraviolet spectrum that can inactivate pathogens like bacteria and viruses. Because of their effectiveness, they are incredibly useful for hospitals, senior living centers, fire and police stations, schools, airports, hotels, office buildings and pretty much everywhere. So what’s the problem?

Similar to UV-A and UV-B rays from the sun, UV-C can damage the skin and eyes. You need to follow strict safety guidelines when the products are being operated. Basically, UV lamps should not be run when anyone is nearby. Trained workers should use the right personal protective equipment (PPE) and make sure products are turned off before performing maintenance. So this is maybe not as simple as screwing in a lightbulb. Disinfection with far-UVC lamps remains largely experimental but it may be safer in that it does not cause temporary skin burns and eye damage.

The other main problem is that if a surface is in shadow, it will not be disinfected. In a recently published study, a standard UV-C lamp was placed in the center of a typical hospital room and some places were partly or completely in shadow and did not receive the full dose needed to assure 99.99% disinfection. To address this problem, UVD Robots, a company based in Odense Denmark, developed a UV system that moves around the room autonomously. These robots are now available in 2000 Chinese hospitals and they are being used in more than 50 countries.

A company called Healthe has made progress on far UV-C lighting. They have developed systems that will be affordable for bars, restaurants, and other small businesses while close to eliminating the potential for spreading viruses. An LED version of UV-C may eventually be in our homes and offices. This can stop all viruses and bacteria. Can this finally be the cure for the common cold?? We will have to wait and see, but I can’t imagine a better time to push the technology envelope to help eliminate this pandemic and any future infections.

References: Lindblad M., Tano E., Lindahl C., Huss F. Ultraviolet-C decontamination of a hospital room: amount of UV light needed. Burns. 2019;46(4):842–849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list]

Mauldin, John. The Grip tightens. Jan 15, 2021. Mauldin Economics. https://www.mauldineconomics.com/frontlinethoughts/the-grip-tightens/

Tornberg, B. Using UV Light to kill Viruses Like COVID-19. Dec. 16, 2020. https://insights.regencylighting.com/can-uv-light-kill-viruses-like-covid-19

Mackenzie, D. Ultraviolet Light Fights New Virus. June 27, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319933/

Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Arteries

January 17, 2021 By Deborah

About 6- 15% of myocardial infarctions (heart attacks) are associated with nonobstructive coronary disease on angiography. This means that far less than 50% of heart attacks are due to blocked arteries. Also, these types of heart attacks occur more commonly in women.

A multinational study was done in which investigators enrolled 170 women with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). These women were scheduled to undergo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and coronary optical coherence tomography (OCT). The OCT test uses infrared light to acquire cross-sectional images of the coronary artery using an intravascular catheter. This allows it to have a higher resolution than intravascular ultrasound.

In 145 women who underwent OCT, 67 had a possible or definite culprit lesion, such as plaque rupture or layered plaque. In 116 women who had an MRI, 62 had an ischemic (reduced blood flow) pattern of abnormalities and 24 had a nonischemic pattern, such as myocarditis or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (heart disease causing an enlarged heart). Overall, A cause for MINOCA was identified in 98 women, with an ischemic etiology in 74, and nonischemic in 24 women.

This study shows the benefit of using multiple imaging tests to identify the mechanism of MINOCA in most cases. It showed almost two thirds of cases related to an ischemic cause, despite the absence of severe obstructive coronary disease by angiography. Women tend to have microvascular disease which affects them four times more than men. They also have different symptoms of myocardial infarction than men. Both genders can exhibit symptoms of chest pain or discomfort but women are more likely to experience shortness of breath, nausea/vomiting and back or jaw pain. It’s best for physicians to order multimodality imaging especially for women with these symptoms to prevent the progression of a heart attack.

Reference: Reynolds, HR et al. Coronary optical coherence tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine underlying causes of MINOCA in women. Circulation 2020 Nov 14; [e-pub]. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONHA.120.052008).

Best Pain Treatments for Common Injuries

January 10, 2021 By Deborah

Many of us have had some minor injuries in our lives. Some of them may include sprains, strains, contusions (bruises), whiplash, nonsurgical fractures of ribs or toes. We typically reach for over-the-counter Tylenol (Acetaminophen) or Ibuprofen or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory’s (NSAID). But are there dangers to these drugs and which one is best to take?

Several sponsoring organizations reviewed 207 trials that included more than 30,000 participants, most younger than 40 with common musculoskeletal injuries that did not involve the lower back. The authors were evaluating best treatments for pain for these common injuries. The results were the following:

For immediate pain relief, best quality evidence supported the use of acetaminophen alone or combined with oral diclofenac (NSAID) or an opioid. Tramadol alone was not effective. The use of oral or topical NSAID’s alone also was supported by lesser quality evidence. For pain control during the first week after injury, acetaminophen plus opioids, topical or oral NSAID’s and acetaminophen alone were effective. Gastrointestinal side effects were associated primarily with opioids and NSAID’s. Neurological side effects were associated with opioids and the use of ibuprofen and cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant) together.

Among non-pharmacologic alternatives, massage and specific acupressure was supported by better evidence than was transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS).

What this meta-analysis did not tell you were the risks with using NSAID’s. These drugs raise the risk for cardiovascular disease, GI bleeding and acute kidney injury (AKI). This is why they need to be avoided or very closely monitored in people at high risk for heart disease (heart failure, congestive heart disease, hypertension, atrial fib, stroke), chronic kidney disease or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Now let’s look at more specific types of NSAID’s and their safety profile. A Danish study was done comparing diclofenac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen and naproxen and their risk for major cardiovascular (CV) events and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Diclofenac was associated with excess short-term cardiovascular and GI bleeding risks compared with the other NSAID’s or acetaminophen (NEJM JW Gen Med Sep 15 2018 and Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77: 1137). Also, in a U.K. study, diclofenac but not naproxen was associated with excess risk for myocardial infarction. Several studies have suggested that naproxen might pose the least CV risk, especially among patients with spondyloarthropathies (ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis) and osteoarthritis. (NEJM JW Gen Med Aug 1 2006 and BMJ 2006; 332:1302; NEJM JW Gen Med Jul 15 2011 and Circulation 2011; 123:2226). So if an NSAID is going to be used, the best choice would be naproxen.

The best recommendations are the use of topical NSAID’s with or without menthol gel due to its effectiveness and lack of toxicity. Of course a combination of a topical anti-inflammatory and non-pharmacologic options (acupressure, massage, chiropractic, physical therapy, supplements) are the way to go. Avoid using NSAID’s long-term as well as opioids, including Tramadol because of substantial potential harms.

All medications have associated risks. Therapeutic doses for a limited time are considered safe and effective. But prolonged use of NSAID’s not only increases the risk of AKI and chronic kidney disease progression but puts those that are older who have diabetes or hypertension at a higher risk of developing these conditions. A clinical report showed that even young healthy adults with no risk factors of kidney disease had developed AKI due to NSAID use. With the opioid crisis still in the national news, nonnarcotic alternatives for pain control are more popular and effective for the most part. But we need to weigh the risks and benefits, and now we know that there are some NSAID’s (naproxen) and their delivery systems (topical) that are safer and should be the first choice in pain management. Make sure to discuss with your practitioner any over-the-counter medications, herbs, or supplements that you are taking. Not all over-the-counter products are safe or benign to adverse effects.

References: Qaseem A et al. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management of acute pain from non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries in adults: A clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians and American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2020 Aug 18; [e-pub]. (https:/doi.org/10.7326/M19-3602)

Busse JW et al. Management of acute pain from non-low back musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2020 Aug 18; [e-pub]. (https:/doi.org/10.7326/M19-3601)

Riva JJ et al. Predictors of prolonged opioid use after initial prescription for acute musculoskeletal injuries in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann InternMed 2020 Aug 18; [e-pub]. (https:/doi.org/10.7326/M19-3600)

Schmidt M et al. Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: Series of nationwide cohort studies. BMJ 2018 Sep 4; 362:k3426. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3426)

Apple, A. The unsaid dangers of NSAIDs. Clinician Reviews. Sep/Oct 2018; ExpertQ&A p. 16.

Mariano F, Cogno, C, Giaretta F, et al. urinary protein profiles in ketorolac-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017;10:269-274.